Skip to content

Africa's Biggest Stage. Africa's Most Isolated Team. Why the Continent Is Not Behind Bafana.

South Africa open the 2026 World Cup today but many Africans across the continent are backing Mexico instead. Xenophobia, evacuations, a long history of hostility to migrants and a diplomatic crisis with the US explain why Bafana have not united the continent behind them.

Mexico's forward #09 Raul Jimenez (R) takes part in a training session at Centro de Alto Rendimiento (CAR) in Mexico City on June 10, 2026, on the eve of the 2026 World Cup football match between Mexico and South Africa. (Photo by Yuri CORTEZ / AFP via Getty Images)

Table of Contents

Today at the Estadio Azteca in Mexico City, Bafana Bafana kick off the 2026 FIFA World Cup against the host nation Mexico. They are the first African team to touch the ball at football's biggest tournament. For a continent that has waited 16 years since South Africa last appeared at a World Cup, this should feel like a shared moment. Across much of Africa, it does not.

On social media platforms, in supporter forums, in the conversations that have been happening across West Africa, East Africa, and Central Africa in the weeks leading up to this tournament, a consistent sentiment has emerged: many African fans will watch today's match wanting Mexico to win. The team carrying the continent's flag into the opening fixture is not, for a significant portion of that continent, the team the continent is behind.

Understanding why requires looking at what has happened inside South Africa in the months before this World Cup, and at a much longer history of how South Africa's relationship with the rest of the continent has been defined.

The Xenophobia That Preceded the Tournament

In April and May 2026, a wave of anti-migrant protests swept through parts of South Africa. Activists under the banner of Operation Dudula and affiliated movements issued ultimatums to undocumented foreigners, demanding they leave the country by June 30. The protests were accompanied by documented incidents of violence against foreign nationals. As reported by Pravda Nigeria, the governments of Ghana, Nigeria, Mozambique and several other countries began evacuating their citizens from South Africa, citing direct threats to their lives and recording fresh cases of attacks in the weeks before the World Cup began.

The timing could not have been more pointed. South Africa were preparing to represent the continent at the biggest tournament in football history. Simultaneously, South African citizens were attacking Nigerian, Ghanaian, and Mozambican nationals in their streets. The two realities existed at the same time, in the same country, and the contradiction was not lost on the football supporters of those targeted nations. A Ghanaian fan who watched their compatriots being evacuated from Johannesburg in May is not going to feel warmth toward Bafana Bafana in June. That is not a complex calculation. It is a direct human response.

A Pattern That Predates 2026

This year's xenophobia wave is not new. South Africa has experienced recurring cycles of anti-migrant violence since 2008, when attacks on foreign nationals left 62 people dead and displaced tens of thousands. Further waves followed in 2015 and 2019. Each time, the victims were disproportionately from other African nations: Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Malawi, Somalia, Nigeria, Ethiopia. Each time, the diplomatic fallout strained South Africa's relationships with the countries whose citizens had been targeted. Each time, football continued on a separate track, as if the violence had nothing to do with which flag supporters chose to wave.

The cumulative effect of those cycles is a continent-wide wariness about South Africa's posture toward its neighbours that no World Cup opening match can erase. When Bafana supporters celebrate today, they will be celebrating alone in a way that no other African nation opening a tournament would be. Morocco in 2022 had the entire continent behind them. Senegal's 2019 AFCON run was a shared African moment. The goodwill that African football generates for its teams at major tournaments is real and consistent. South Africa is the exception, and the exception has a cause.

The Diplomatic Dimension

The domestic xenophobia story intersects with a separate political dimension that has also shaped continental sentiment. South Africa's relationship with the United States under the Trump administration became publicly hostile in a way that few African nations experienced directly. President Trump made unfounded claims about white farmers being systematically killed in South Africa. The South African ambassador to the United States was expelled from Washington. President Ramaphosa's visit to the White House in May was described across South African and international media as tense and confrontational.

The specific relevance to the World Cup is what it communicated to the rest of Africa about the dynamics in play. An African journalist directly told FIFA president Gianni Infantino at a Nairobi press conference, in the presence of FIFA vice-president Patrice Motsepe, that they were going to play a World Cup in a country where some of them did not feel welcome. That statement was reported by the Associated Press and circulated widely across the continent. It reflects a broader anxiety about the 2026 tournament that South Africa's specific diplomatic situation with Washington amplified rather than created.

What the Continental Support Looks Like in Practice

None of this means that African fans want South Africa to lose in a hostile or personal sense. The majority of the sentiment across social media and supporter communities is less about animosity toward Bafana specifically and more about the absence of the warmth and collective identification that usually accompanies African teams at major tournaments. Fans in Lagos, Nairobi, and Dakar will watch today's match. Many will be hoping for Mexico. Not because they dislike South African football, but because the events of the past several months have broken the emotional connection that continental solidarity requires.

It is worth noting that South African football supporters themselves are not universally indifferent to these criticisms. Some have expressed discomfort with the timing of xenophobic activism relative to the World Cup. Some have publicly distanced themselves from the anti-migrant movements. The Bafana Bafana players themselves have no involvement in Operation Dudula or any political movement. Mofokeng, Mokoena, Williams and the rest of the squad are footballers doing their jobs. The weight they carry today is not of their making. It is the weight of a country's unresolved contradictions arriving at the worst possible moment on the biggest possible stage.

A Moment That Could Change the Calculation

Sport has a particular power to shift sentiment quickly and completely. If Bafana play with courage at the Azteca today, if Mofokeng does something extraordinary in front of 80,000 people in Mexico City, if South Africa produces the kind of performance that reminds Africa what it felt like in 2010 when Siphiwe Tshabalala scored past Mexico in Johannesburg, the neutrality and quiet hostility could melt into genuine continental pride faster than any diplomatic statement could achieve. Football is like that. The question is whether this team can produce that moment.

The World Cup started today. Bafana are in it. The continent is watching, even those who are watching from the wrong side of the fence. If South Africa play well enough, the fence might move.

Latest